Which Countries Do Not Have A Remo Agreement

I did not know that I had the opportunity to send the application directly to the court, where the divorce regime was established, instead of spending time finding a lawyer with appropriate experience or perhaps even a second language. In the meantime, the court officials responsible for advising candidates in the REMO procedure were never available and never contacted me on my case. Most importantly, the London REMO unit, which aims to facilitate communication between the British court and the court in the country where the children`s other parents live, has been able to make endless mistakes, resulting in delays and misunderstandings. These were only revealed because I am bilingual and so I was able to see the differences between the original and the translated inscription when I requested copies of all the correspondences. A recidivism seizure order (REMO) is an international agreement between different countries that can help restore the subsistence education of a parent`s children living abroad. A “REMO” can also help a parent living abroad to require parents residing in the UK. We also have many contacts with private investigators who can help find the parent and/or property of the non-resident parent. REMO represents Reciprocal Enforcement of Maintenance Orders. A country that has supported REMO can enforce another country`s food order.

A “REMO” can also be used for the foreign income of a non-resident parent with his or her usual residence in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom has REMO agreements with more than 100 countries. This means that the English courts may be able to impose a provision made in another country. Here you will find a list of countries where a UK maintenance contract can be imposed: if you have an existing maintenance contract, you can request that this order be executed in the country where the paying parent lives. This practice is influenced by the UK`s withdrawal from the EU on 31 January 2020. This has an impact, among other things, on practitioners, who review the appropriate courts and the methods of implementation.